ATI/RI/PDR Soap Opera 2
Edited by Oct 17, 2004 7:34 am
What do you think?
take #2.
"Personally, I could care less about how anyone feels about me on the internet."
Then why were you begging Ron Mexico to be nice to you the other day?
klaatu - Sep 28, 2005 11:55 am (#2909 of 2925)
I don't think Bela believes Archos is Barry. Archos became Bela's target and a new enemy because he was talking civilly to Barry. Bela can't have that. His enemies can't have friends who support them, that's a real danger to Bela. So Archos became the enemy. Archos using Barry's tagline is the only justification he needs to construct this crazy charge, that Archos isn't real, he's really Barry Kort. Now he will repeat it over and over.
It's not about truth. It's about repetition. And it is amazing.
And it is an attempt to get Recycla to ban Archos from ATI.
Archos is just fine.
Sukey
Anyone who doesn't leave a discussion when they need or want to is doing themselves a disservice. A person shouldn't care what others think of them when it comes to their own sanity. Participation is not an obligation.
No, but who would want to be accused of running away?
klaatu - Sep 28, 2005 12:29 pm (#2913 of 2925)
Edited by Sep 28, 2005 12:30 pm
No one wants it but no one has to pay attention to it. Running away is often said by someone who is already losing an argument and is trying to get control back by asking stupid questions.
"Archos became Bela's target and a new enemy because he was talking civilly to Barry. Bela can't have that."
I talk civilly to Barry and Bela hasn't targetted me. Not that I would mind if he did...
Edited by Sep 28, 2005 1:27 pm
Oh, stick it, you flea-infested scrotal-jowled wall-eyed slack-jawed revisionist misanthropic postmodern opportunist.
"Archos became Bela's target and a new enemy because he was talking civilly to Barry. Bela can't have that."
Klatu's usual use of distortion, half-truth, misdirection, pseudo mind-reading and assertio bogoso
Archos is just fine.
:::bows:::
Oh. Thank you.
::: blushing:::
And who is Ruth K?
Claude-Mohamed Dorsel - Sep 28, 2005 11:51 pm (#2918 of 2925)
You don't want to know. She was mostly maddening and offensive, but could be fun.
Sukey
Edited by Sep 28, 2005 11:57 pm
And who is Ruth K?
If you haven't experienced the Divine Ruth-K, you haven't lived. Here is her forum:
http://wc6.worldcrossing.com/webx?14@@.1dde166b
She used to call Reynaldo 'Trou du cul'.
Claude-Mohamed Dorsel - Sep 29, 2005 5:25 am (#2921 of 2925)
That's why I accused her of offensiveness, of course.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
Edited by Oct 29, 2005 6:41 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
The most amazing thing about that article is that there's a link to an entire page about a guy who apparently earned "fame" solely for trolling on Slashdot. Even tribute sites (he committed suicide earlier this year). Erna has a lot hard work catching up to do. You can become a legend and media sensation by becoming a troll. I did not know that. What have I been doing wrong? What special trolling skills did that guy have that I didn't?
I am also disappointed that Dick B. Free was not mentioned in the History of Trolling. Surely he belongs on any list of Great Trolls of Internet History. Is there such a list, anyway? Perhaps one should be compiled. I'm sure most of it would make for hilarious reading, particularly of the early days of the internet when people weren't as troll-scarred and much more gullible.
Of course my trolling days are long over, but I won't deny that it was great fun back in the day. I think that's the motivation for most trolls, just kids having a laugh. The internet era equivalent of making prank calls, rolling toilet paper on Halloween.
I think so.
A new experiment at Random International.
-------------
-
Dora - May 6, 2009 4:33 pm (#1342 of 1381)
OK, starting now I'm going to keep count of Bela & Klatu derailing each other's topical posts.

